↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Don’t let up: implementing and sustaining change in a new post-licensure education model for developing extended role practitioners involved in arthritis care

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Don’t let up: implementing and sustaining change in a new post-licensure education model for developing extended role practitioners involved in arthritis care
Published in
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, November 2015
DOI 10.2147/jmdh.s83237
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katie Lundon, Rachel Shupak, Sonya Canzian, Ed Ziesmann, Rayfel Schneider

Abstract

Across a 9-year period, the Advanced Clinician Practitioner in Arthritis Care program has achieved a set of short-term "wins" giving direction and momentum to the development of new roles for health care practitioners providing arthritis care. This is a viable model for post-licensure training offered to multiple allied health professionals to support the development of competent extended role practitioners (extended scope practice). Challenges at this critical juncture include: retain focus, drive, and commitment; develop academic and financial partnerships transferring short-term success to long-term sustainability; advanced, context-driven, system-level evaluation including fiscal outcome; health care policy adaptation to new human health resource development. Success includes: completed 2-year health services research evaluating 37 graduates; leadership, innovation, educational excellence, and human health resource benefit awards; influential publications/presentations addressing post-licensure education/outcome, interprofessional collaboration, and improved patient care.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 24%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Psychology 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 7 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2015.
All research outputs
#4,859,581
of 6,569,769 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#141
of 195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,642
of 208,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,569,769 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.