↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

VEMP using a new low-frequency bone conduction transducer

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 314)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
27 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
VEMP using a new low-frequency bone conduction transducer
Published in
Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, September 2018
DOI 10.2147/mder.s171369
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bo Håkansson, Karl-Johan Fredén Jansson, Tomas Tengstrand, Leif Johannsen, Måns Eeg-Olofsson, Cristina Rigato, Elisabeth Dahlström, Sabine Reinfeldt

Abstract

A new prototype bone conduction (BC) transducer B250, with an emphasized low-frequency response, is evaluated in vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) investigations. The aim was to compare cervical (cVEMP) and ocular (oVEMP) responses using tone bursts at 250 and 500 Hz with BC stimulation using the B250 and the conventional B81 transducer and by using air conduction (AC) stimulation. Three normal subjects were investigated in a pilot study. BC stimulation was applied to the mastoids in cVEMP, and both mastoid and forehead in oVEMP investigations. BC stimulation was found to reach VEMP thresholds at considerably lower hearing levels than in AC stimulation (30-40 dB lower oVEMP threshold at 250 Hz). Three or more cVEMP and oVEMP responses at consecutive 5 dB increasing mastoid stimulation levels were only obtained in all subjects using the B250 transducer at 250 Hz. Similar BC thresholds were obtained for both ipsilateral and contralateral mastoid stimulation. Forehead stimulation, if needed, may require a more powerful vibration output. Viable VEMP responses can be obtained at a considerably lower hearing level with BC stimulation than by AC stimulation. The cVEMP and oVEMP responses were similar when measured on one side and with the B250 attached to both ipsilateral and contralateral mastoids.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 14 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 6 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 17 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 199. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2018.
All research outputs
#198,850
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#5
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,036
of 345,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them