↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Preseason preparation training and endothelial function in elite professional soccer players

Overview of attention for article published in Vascular Health and Risk Management, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Preseason preparation training and endothelial function in elite professional soccer players
Published in
Vascular Health and Risk Management, November 2015
DOI 10.2147/vhrm.s92636
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nikolaos E Androulakis, Nikolaos E Koundourakis, Eleni Nioti, Paraskevi Spatharaki, Despina Hatzisymeon, Ioannis Miminas, Michael G Alexandrakis

Abstract

To examine whether a high volume of soccer-specific training can lead to endothelial activation and/or dysfunction in professional soccer players due to exercise-induced oxidative stress. Twenty-three (15 nonsmokers and eight smokers) healthy, elite male professional soccer players (mean age: 25.2±4.3 years, BMI: 23.1±1.3 kg/m(2), fat: 7.8%±2.6%) were selected for this study. All participants had a full clinical and laboratory evaluation. von Willebrand factor antigen (vWf Ag) plasma levels were measured on two different occasions: 1 day before the beginning of the preseason preparation period and after 7 weeks of strenuous exercise. Mean vWf Ag plasma levels were significantly decreased from 95.1%±26% to 88.3%±27.2% at the end of the experimental period (P=0.018), suggesting a potential beneficial effect on the endothelium of these athletes. Further analysis showed that age greater than 29 years with an age range from 29 to 34 years can not impair this effect (P>0.05). Strenuous exercise did not lead to endothelium activation or dysfunction in well-trained elite soccer players. On the contrary, it seemed to produce a beneficial effect on the endothelium of these players.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 17 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 9 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Decision Sciences 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 17 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2015.
All research outputs
#17,438,425
of 25,582,611 outputs
Outputs from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#531
of 785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,062
of 295,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,582,611 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.