↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

In vivo biodistribution and biological impact of injected carbon nanotubes using magnetic resonance techniques

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
In vivo biodistribution and biological impact of injected carbon nanotubes using magnetic resonance techniques
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, February 2011
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s16653
Pubmed ID
Authors

Achraf Al Faraj, Florence Fauvelle, Nathalie Luciani, Ghislaine Lacroix, Michael Levy, Yannick Cremillieux, Emmanuelle Canet-Soulas

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 2 5%
France 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 34 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 33%
Chemistry 8 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Materials Science 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 3 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2015.
All research outputs
#6,904,547
of 12,438,331 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#811
of 2,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,557
of 338,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#38
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,438,331 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,456 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.