↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Riding a roller coaster: narrative typologies of patients with neuroendocrine tumors

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Riding a roller coaster: narrative typologies of patients with neuroendocrine tumors
Published in
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, December 2015
DOI 10.2147/jmdh.s90744
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessia Miconi, Daniele De Nuzzo, Solfrid Vatne, Paola Pierantognetti

Abstract

Illness stories have attracted growing attention in health care research in the context of learning from looking at the world through the patients' eyes. No narrative studies were found about the patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs); a rare illness including tumors usually starting in hormone-producing cells. The aim of this article was to develop an extended understanding of these patients' experiences and struggles, as well as their solutions to a common problem. The data source was 21 letters written by the patients with NETs treated at an ambulatory treatment center at a large urban hospital in Italy. The letters were analyzed using the Arthur Frank's narrative method. We paid particular attention to statements of self-experience, which is crucial to get the character of the story. We identified four different typologies: "Not illness stories", "Living in imbalance", "Living a new life in balance", and "Living a normal life". The main characteristics of these four groups could be linked to Frank's typologies. However, the patients with this periodically changing disease were continuously in the process of attaining balance in life, and they might move between these various typologies. The NETs are incurable illnesses that challenged the peoples to attaining a new balance in life. We will highlight stories focusing on the patients' imbalance and chaos because they illuminated the patients' concrete suffering, which might provide clinicians with specific information about the patients' emotional, physical, and spiritual state. Through learning from the stories of the patients attaining new balance, it seems possible to move forward to acceptance and to develop a model for a new way of living. However, we are skeptical about labeling these stories as a model for clinical practice because they might contribute to individualistic and heroic prescriptions for life that are impossible for others to achieve.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 22%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Lecturer 2 7%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 6 22%
Unknown 8 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 19%
Psychology 4 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Arts and Humanities 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 8 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2015.
All research outputs
#20,816,184
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#772
of 1,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,684
of 396,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.