↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Neuroleptic-induced deficit syndrome in bipolar disorder with psychosis

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Neuroleptic-induced deficit syndrome in bipolar disorder with psychosis
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, February 2016
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s99577
Pubmed ID
Authors

Satoshi Ueda, Takeshi Sakayori, Ataru Omori, Hajime Fukuta, Takashi Kobayashi, Kousuke Ishizaka, Tomoyuki Saijo, Yoshiro Okubo

Abstract

Neuroleptics can induce not only physical adverse effects but also mental effects that produce deficit status in thought, affect, cognition, and behavior. This condition is known as neuroleptic-induced deficit syndrome (NIDS), which includes apathy, lack of initiative, anhedonia, indifference, blunted affect, and reduced insight into disease. Although this old concept now appears almost forgotten, neuroleptics, whether typical or atypical, can make depression or bipolar disorder resemble other more refractory conditions, readily leading to mistaken diagnosis and inappropriate treatment. The authors describe three cases of NIDS superimposed on depressive phase in bipolar disorder with psychosis, where the attending psychiatrist's failure to recognize NIDS prevented patients from receiving effective treatment and achieving remission. All cases achieved remission after reduction of neuroleptics and intensive therapy, including electroconvulsive therapy, for bipolar depression. The concept of NIDS was originally introduced for schizophrenia, and it has rarely been highlighted in other diseases. In recent years, however, atypical antipsychotics are being more often administered to patients with bipolar disorder. Psychiatrists, therefore, should also remember and exercise caution regarding NIDS in the pharmacotherapy of bipolar disorder with and without psychosis. The authors believe that the concept of NIDS needs to be reappraised in current psychiatry.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 17%
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 34%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2017.
All research outputs
#877,267
of 14,533,317 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#108
of 2,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,855
of 340,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#5
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,533,317 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.