| Title |
Effectiveness of Cucumis sativus extract versus glucosamine-chondroitin in the management of moderate osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s173227 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert J Nash, Boris KG Azantsa, Hazel Sharp, Velmurugan Shanmugham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 45 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 49 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2023.
All research outputs
#612,383
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#48
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,324
of 354,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#2
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.