↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Effectiveness of Cucumis sativus extract versus glucosamine-chondroitin in the management of moderate osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Effectiveness of <em>Cucumis sativus</em> extract versus glucosamine-chondroitin in the management of moderate osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2018
DOI 10.2147/cia.s173227
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert J. Nash, Boris K. G. Azantsa, Hazel Sharp, Velmurugan Shanmugham

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 21%
Student > Bachelor 6 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Professor 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 14 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2019.
All research outputs
#8,124,715
of 14,125,937 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#786
of 1,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,065
of 315,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,125,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them