↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Prospective randomized comparative study between venturi and peristaltic pumps in WhiteStar Signature® phacoemulsification machine

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Prospective randomized comparative study between venturi and peristaltic pumps in WhiteStar Signature<sup>&reg;</sup> phacoemulsification machine
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, December 2018
DOI 10.2147/opth.s177978
Authors

Wilson Takashi Hida, André Lins de Medeiros, André Gustavo de Araújo Rolim, Antonio Francisco Pimenta Motta, Danilo Varela Kniggendorf, Rodrigo Lafetá Franco de Queiroz, Mário Augusto Pereira Dias Chaves, Pedro Carlos Carricondo, Celso Takashi Nakano, Walton Nosé

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,981,027
of 12,728,337 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#755
of 1,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,798
of 286,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,728,337 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,638 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them