↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Analysis on clinical effects of dilation and curettage guided by ultrasonography versus hysteroscopy after uterine artery embolization in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user
Title
Analysis on clinical effects of dilation and curettage guided by ultrasonography versus hysteroscopy after uterine artery embolization in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, January 2019
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s184387
Authors

Jian Qiu, Yunfeng Fu, Jiewei Xu, Xiaohong Huang, Guorong Yao, Weiguo Lu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2019.
All research outputs
#6,481,720
of 12,471,096 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#355
of 920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,475
of 234,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,471,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 920 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them