↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

What is this page? Embed badge

Analysis on clinical effects of dilation and curettage guided by ultrasonography versus hysteroscopy after uterine artery embolization in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Wikipedia Google+ Dimensions citations
Title
Analysis on clinical effects of dilation and curettage guided by ultrasonography versus hysteroscopy after uterine artery embolization in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, January 2019
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s184387
Pubmed ID
30662266
Authors

Jian Qiu, Yunfeng Fu, Jiewei Xu, Xiaohong Huang, Guorong Yao, Weiguo Lu

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Other 3 13%
Librarian 1 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unknown 11 46%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,248,085
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#316
of 1,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,529
of 438,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,276 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Dove Medical Press.