| Title |
The efficacy and safety of dutasteride compared with finasteride in treating men with androgenetic alopecia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s192435 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhongbao Zhou, Shiqiang Song, Zhenli Gao, Jitao Wu, Jiajia Ma, Yuanshan Cui |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| Japan | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Researcher | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 46 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 31% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 52 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2023.
All research outputs
#950,665
of 24,801,176 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#83
of 1,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,899
of 448,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#2
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,801,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.