↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

The efficacy and safety of dutasteride compared with finasteride in treating men with androgenetic alopecia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
<p>The efficacy and safety of dutasteride compared with finasteride in treating men with androgenetic alopecia: a systematic review and meta-analysis</p>
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, February 2019
DOI 10.2147/cia.s192435
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhongbao Zhou, Shiqiang Song, Zhenli Gao, Jitao Wu, Jiajia Ma, Yuanshan Cui

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Student > Master 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 45%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 9 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2021.
All research outputs
#3,576,905
of 17,982,104 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#435
of 1,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,133
of 276,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,982,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them