↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: current management strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Orthopedic research and reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
<p>Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: current management strategies</p>
Published in
Orthopedic research and reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.2147/orr.s166735
Authors

Alessandro Aprato, Andrea Conti, Federico Bertolo, Alessandro Massè

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 12%
Other 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Lecturer 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 6 24%
Unknown 5 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 72%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Unknown 5 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2019.
All research outputs
#9,146,487
of 14,565,799 outputs
Outputs from Orthopedic research and reviews
#23
of 57 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,729
of 266,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orthopedic research and reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,565,799 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them