| Title |
Utilization of computerized clinical decision support for potentially inappropriate medications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s192927 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
K Alagiakrishnan, M Ballermann, D Rolfson, K Mohindra, CA Sadowski, A Ausford, J Romney, RS Hayward |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 9 | 41% |
| Canada | 2 | 9% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 73% |
| Scientists | 4 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 28% |
| Unknown | 20 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 20% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 23 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,693,529
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#183
of 1,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,744
of 365,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.