↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Utilization of computerized clinical decision support for potentially inappropriate medications

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 tweeters
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
<p>Utilization of computerized clinical decision support for potentially inappropriate medications</p>
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, April 2019
DOI 10.2147/cia.s192927
Pubmed ID
Authors

K Alagiakrishnan, M Ballermann, D Rolfson, K Mohindra, CA Sadowski, A Ausford, J Romney, RS Hayward

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 13 25%
Unknown 17 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Computer Science 3 6%
Decision Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 20 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,933,943
of 19,032,591 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#224
of 1,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,211
of 281,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,032,591 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them