↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Dimethyl fumarate in the management of multiple sclerosis: appropriate patient selection and special considerations

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Dimethyl fumarate in the management of multiple sclerosis: appropriate patient selection and special considerations
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, March 2016
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s85099
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luca Prosperini, Simona Pontecorvo

Abstract

Delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF), also known as gastroresistant DMF, is the most recently approved oral disease-modifying treatment (DMT) for relapsing multiple sclerosis. Two randomized clinical trials (Determination of the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Fumarate in Relapsing-Remitting MS [DEFINE] and Comparator and an Oral Fumarate in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis [CONFIRM]) demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing relapse rate and radiological signs of disease activity, as seen on magnetic resonance imaging. The DEFINE study also indicated a significant effect of DMF on disability worsening, while the low incidence of confirmed disability worsening in the CONFIRM trial rendered an insignificant reduction among the DMF-treated groups when compared to placebo. DMF also demonstrated a good safety profile and acceptable tolerability, since the most common side effects (gastrointestinal events and flushing reactions) are usually transient and mild to moderate in severity. Here, we discuss the place in therapy of DMF for individuals with relapsing multiple sclerosis, providing a tentative therapeutic algorithm to manage newly diagnosed patients and those who do not adequately respond to self-injectable DMTs. Literature data supporting the potential role of DMF as a first-line therapy are presented. The possibility of using DMF as switching treatment or even as an add-on strategy in patients with breakthrough disease despite self-injectable DMTs will also be discussed. Lastly, we argue about the role of DMF as an exit strategy from natalizumab-treated patients who are considered at risk for developing multifocal progressive leukoencephalopathy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Russia 1 1%
Unknown 65 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 24%
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 34%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Neuroscience 5 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 17 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2016.
All research outputs
#14,387,227
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#591
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,262
of 312,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#15
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.