↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

A rapid technique for en masse soft cataract phacoemulsification

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
<p>A rapid technique for en masse soft cataract phacoemulsification</p>
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, April 2019
DOI 10.2147/opth.s197359
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rohit Om Parkash, Shruti Mahajan, Tushya Om Parkash, Rasik B Vajpayee, Tushar Om Parkash

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2019.
All research outputs
#8,808,918
of 14,058,867 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#939
of 1,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,121
of 258,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#21
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,058,867 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,891 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.