↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Comments on a meta-analysis and systematic review of the clinicopathological significance of CDH1 in gastric cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Design, Development and Therapy, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Comments on a meta-analysis and systematic review of the clinicopathological significance of CDH1 in gastric cancer
Published in
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, March 2016
DOI 10.2147/dddt.s103922
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chao Tu, Lianwen Yuan, Jianping Zhou

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2016.
All research outputs
#4,835,157
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#304
of 2,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,447
of 312,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#12
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.