↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

A review of family carers' experiences of hospital discharge for people with dementia, and the rationale for involving service users in health research

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Healthcare Leadership, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
A review of family carers' experiences of hospital discharge for people with dementia, and the rationale for involving service users in health research
Published in
Journal of Healthcare Leadership, June 2015
DOI 10.2147/jhl.s70020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carole Mockford

Abstract

In the UK, service user involvement is an important factor in health policy, and obtaining research funding. It may be helpful in expanding our knowledge in areas where research evidence is poor such as experiences of hospital discharge planning for the family carers of people with dementia. A rapid review. All study designs published in the English language were eligible for inclusion. Databases included: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Cochrane library and Web of Knowledge. A qualitative analysis was undertaken. Four themes were identified: preparation for hospital discharge - dissatisfaction with being kept informed, discharge arrangements and management of conditions; little time to prepare. Communication between staff and families at discharge - insufficient communication regarding services, not being listened to and being undervalued as a resource could compromise post-discharge care. Support services post discharge - carers need help negotiating, and working with, services with regard to timing, and meeting requirements. Coping post hospital discharge - inadequate understanding about ability to cope, and patient's impairment, and family conflict over care may lead to unnecessary re-admission to hospital, or long term care. Evidence of specialist dementia models at discharge is described. Carers are not always involved in hospital discharge planning as well as they might be. Issues are complex and depend on a number of factors. Poor communication can be overcome and carers can be better supported to cope post discharge as illustrated in the dementia models. The evidence base is weak but the absence of evidence does not indicate an absence of good practice. Carers who may feel their world is far removed from the academic world may not ordinarily participate in research studies. Service users, as co-researchers, may be able to improve trust and rapport between research and communities, collect fresh insights and gain deeper and more insightful data from participants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 24%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 3 6%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 13 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 20%
Social Sciences 9 17%
Psychology 3 6%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 13 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2016.
All research outputs
#15,758,151
of 23,406,603 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Healthcare Leadership
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,841
of 268,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Healthcare Leadership
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,406,603 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them