↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

The role of long noncoding RNA in traumatic brain injury

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
<p>The role of long noncoding RNA in traumatic brain injury</p>
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, June 2019
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s206624
Authors

Zhenxing Li, Kaiwei Han, Danfeng Zhang, Jigang Chen, Zheng Xu, Lijun Hou

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 18%
Researcher 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 27%
Neuroscience 2 18%
Chemistry 1 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2019.
All research outputs
#12,194,198
of 15,341,743 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,818
of 2,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,512
of 262,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,341,743 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.