Title |
Review: brain neurobiology of gambling disorder based on rodent models
|
---|---|
Published in |
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.2147/ndt.s192746 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gabriel C Quintero Garzola |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
Researcher | 4 | 10% |
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 17% |
Unknown | 15 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 9 | 21% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 10% |
Psychology | 3 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Unknown | 16 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,266,724
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,088
of 3,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,244
of 363,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#35
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.