↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

The short-term physiological impact of switching reusable silicone hydrogel wearers into a hydrogel daily disposable multifocal

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
<p>The short-term physiological impact of switching reusable silicone hydrogel wearers into a hydrogel daily disposable multifocal</p>
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, July 2019
DOI 10.2147/opth.s208905
Authors

Amir M. Moezzi, Jalaiah Varikooty, Doerte Luensmann, Marc-Matthias Schulze, Alison Ng, Thomas Karkkainen, Jing Xu, Lyndon Jones

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Student > Master 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Unspecified 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2019.
All research outputs
#5,445,820
of 17,566,999 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#416
of 2,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,940
of 269,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#7
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,566,999 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,541 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.