↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Intraductal meibomian gland probing: background, patient selection, procedure, and perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
<p>Intraductal meibomian gland probing: background, patient selection, procedure, and perspectives</p>
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, July 2019
DOI 10.2147/opth.s183174
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven L. Maskin, Sreevardhan Alluri

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 50%
Professor 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 33%
Unknown 2 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,327,445
of 14,360,928 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#336
of 1,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,615
of 255,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#9
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,360,928 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,945 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.