| Title |
Different durations of cognitive stimulation therapy for Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s210062 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juexuan Chen, Yuting Duan, Huanjie Li, Liming Lu, Jihong Liu, Chunzhi Tang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 38 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
| Psychology | 9 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 40 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,762,265
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#484
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,471
of 363,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#12
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.