<p>Treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy with topical NSAIDs</p>
Clinical Ophthalmology, August 2019
Sepehr Bahadorani, Kyle MacLean, Kendall Wannamaker, Edward Rickie Chu, Nathan Gresores, Jeong-Hyeon Sohn, Roberto Diaz-Rohena, Michael A Singer
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||5||71%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||2||29%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Doctoral Student||1||6%|
|Student > Master||1||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||4||24%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||1||6%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2019.
All research outputs
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
of 3,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 346,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,258 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.