↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Utilization, effect, and benefit of the individualized Meeting Centers Support Program for people with dementia and caregivers

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
Title
Utilization, effect, and benefit of the individualized Meeting Centers Support Program for people with dementia and caregivers
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, August 2019
DOI 10.2147/cia.s212852
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rose-Marie Dröes, Annelies van Rijn, Eline Rus, Seghoslène Dacier, Franka Meiland

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 185 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Student > Master 18 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 6%
Other 10 5%
Researcher 10 5%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 89 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 29 16%
Psychology 15 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 7%
Computer Science 8 4%
Unspecified 6 3%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 93 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2020.
All research outputs
#6,576,179
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#618
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,739
of 359,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#15
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.