↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The importance of early identification of infusion-related reactions to monoclonal antibodies

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
The importance of early identification of infusion-related reactions to monoclonal antibodies
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, August 2019
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s204909
Pubmed ID
Authors

Macarena C Cáceres, Jorge Guerrero-Martín, Demetrio Pérez-Civantos, Patricia Palomo-López, Juan Ignacio Delgado-Mingorance, Noelia Durán-Gómez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Other 6 13%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Student > Master 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 20 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 22 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,051,839
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#347
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,695
of 359,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.