↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Challenges to detect glaucomatous visual field loss with pupil perimetry [Corrigendum]

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
<p>Challenges to detect glaucomatous visual field loss with pupil perimetry [Corrigendum]</p>
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, September 2019
DOI 10.2147/opth.s229280
Authors

Ken Asakawa, Nobuyuki Shoji

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2019.
All research outputs
#16,654,920
of 18,829,177 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,913
of 2,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,889
of 275,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#35
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,829,177 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,260 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.