↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Helping everyone do better: a call for validation studies of routinely recorded health data

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Helping everyone do better: a call for validation studies of routinely recorded health data
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, April 2016
DOI 10.2147/clep.s104448
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vera Ehrenstein, Irene Petersen, Liam Smeeth, Susan Jick, Eric I. Benchimol, Jonas F. Ludvigsson, Henrik Toft Sørensen, Ehrenstein, Vera, Petersen, Irene, Smeeth, Liam, Jick, Susan S, Benchimol, Eric I, Ludvigsson, Jonas F, Sørensen, Henrik Toft, Ehrenstein, V, Petersen, I, Smeeth, L, Jick, SS, Benchimol, EI, Ludvigsson, JF, Sorensen, HT

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Other 3 13%
Professor 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Unknown 7 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2017.
All research outputs
#2,493,629
of 11,700,978 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#69
of 328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,553
of 280,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,700,978 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.