| Title |
The development of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) intervention to enhance independence in dementia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s214367 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lauren Yates, Emese Csipke, Esme Moniz-Cook, Phuong Leung, Holly Walton, Georgina Charlesworth, Aimee Spector, Eef Hogervorst, Gail Mountain, Martin Orrell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 42% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 157 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 5% |
| Researcher | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 16% |
| Unknown | 63 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 20 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 68 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,231,543
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#443
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,668
of 350,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#13
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.