| Title |
Comparative diagnostic accuracy of ACE-III and MoCA for detecting mild cognitive impairment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ndt.s212328 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bian-Rong Wang, Hui-Fen Zheng, Chang Xu, Yi Sun, Ying-Dong Zhang, Jian-Quan Shi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Librarian | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 9 | 23% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,786,544
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#643
of 3,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,048
of 350,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#17
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.