| Title |
Congenital lobar emphysema: diagnosis and treatment options
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/copd.s170581 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Omer Faruk Demir, Melih Hangul, Mehmet Kose |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Researcher | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 41 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 45 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,417,018
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#415
of 2,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,553
of 363,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#12
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.