Title |
Depression influences the quality of diabetes-related self-management activities in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, April 2016
|
DOI | 10.2147/cia.s104083 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bogdan Timar, Gabriela Mut-Vitcu, Romulus Timar, Cristian Oancea, Ioan Cosmin Citu |
Abstract |
To evaluate the prevalence of depression and its impact on the quality of diabetes-related self-care activities in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. In this cross-sectional study, 184 patients with type 2 diabetes were enrolled. Depression was evaluated using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 while the quality of diabetes-related self-care activities was assessed using the Summary of Diabetes-Related Self Care Activities Questionnaire. In our study group, 53.3% of the patients had moderate depression, 17.9% had severe depression, and 28.8% had no depression symptoms. Patient's age (P=0.024), presence of diabetic neuropathy (P<0.001), and body mass index (P=0.037) proved to be independent and significant predictors for developing depression in patients with type 2 diabetes. The severity of depression was reverse correlated with the quality of self-care activities for all the studied components: global score (r=-0.305), diet intervention score (r=-0.297), exercise score (r=-0.388), glycemic monitoring score (r=-0.055), and feet care score (r=-0.180). The presence of severe depression was associated with an increased prevalence of diabetes complications such as diabetic neuropathy and chronic kidney disease. The prevalence of depression is higher in patients with type 2 diabetes compared to general population. Depression has a major negative impact on the quality of diabetes-related self-care activities and, being a treatable condition, proactive screening followed in case of a positive diagnosis by adequate treatment should be performed in all patients with diabetes. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 108 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 15% |
Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
Researcher | 14 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
Other | 26 | 24% |
Unknown | 19 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 25% |
Psychology | 10 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
Mathematics | 2 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 6% |
Unknown | 25 | 23% |