↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Meta-Analysis of Clipping versus Coiling for the Treatment of Unruptured Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: Direct Comparison of Procedure-Related Complications

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
<p>Meta-Analysis of Clipping versus Coiling for the Treatment of Unruptured Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: Direct Comparison of Procedure-Related Complications</p>
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, December 2019
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s226353
Authors

Wen-qiang Xin, Qi-qiang Xin, Xin-yu Yang

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 14%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 29%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Unknown 13 62%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2019.
All research outputs
#14,400,656
of 16,329,437 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#2,063
of 2,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#320,405
of 385,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,329,437 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.