↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Clinical Significance of Bronchodilator Responsiveness Evaluated by Forced Vital Capacity in COPD: SPIROMICS Cohort Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 2,578)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Clinical Significance of Bronchodilator Responsiveness Evaluated by Forced Vital Capacity in COPD: SPIROMICS Cohort Analysis
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, December 2019
DOI 10.2147/copd.s220164
Pubmed ID
Authors

Igor Z Barjaktarevic, Russell G Buhr, Xiaoyan Wang, Scott Hu, David Couper, Wayne Anderson, Richard E Kanner, Robert Paine III, Surya P Bhatt, Nirav R Bhakta, Mehrdad Arjomandi, Robert J Kaner, Cheryl S Pirozzi, Jeffrey L Curtis, Wanda K O’Neal, Prescott G Woodruff, MeiLan K Han, Fernando J Martinez, Nadia Hansel, James Michael Wells, Victor E Ortega, Eric A Hoffman, Claire M Doerschuk, Victor Kim, Mark T Dransfield, M Bradley Drummond, Russell Bowler, Gerard Criner, Stephanie A Christenson, Bonnie Ronish, Stephen P Peters, Jerry A Krishnan, Donald P Tashkin, Christopher B Cooper

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 26%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Lecturer 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 9 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 10 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2020.
All research outputs
#491,407
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#16
of 2,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,736
of 473,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#1
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.