↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Comparative Results Between “Epi-Off” Conventional and Accelerated Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for Progressive Keratoconus in Pediatric Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Comparative Results Between “Epi-Off” Conventional and Accelerated Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for Progressive Keratoconus in Pediatric Patients
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, December 2019
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s224533
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristina Ariadna Nicula, Anca Maria Rednik, Adriana Elena Bulboacă, Dorin Nicula

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 20%
Student > Postgraduate 2 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 20%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2020.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#1,070
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#357,703
of 473,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#14
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.