↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Comparison Between Silicone Oil and Gas in Tamponading Giant Retinal Breaks

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
<p>Comparison Between Silicone Oil and Gas in Tamponading Giant Retinal Breaks</p>
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, January 2020
DOI 10.2147/opth.s237783
Authors

Hossam Eldeen Mohammad Moharram, Ahmed Shawkat Mohamed Abdelhalim, Mohamed Abdel Hamid, Mohamed Farouk Abdelkader

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 20%
Student > Master 2 20%
Student > Postgraduate 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 70%
Unspecified 2 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2020.
All research outputs
#10,257,462
of 16,649,729 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#843
of 2,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,088
of 385,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#39
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,649,729 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,020 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.