↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Clinical Features of Vitreomacular Traction Syndrome with Peripheral Vitreoretinal Adhesion

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
<p>Clinical Features of Vitreomacular Traction Syndrome with Peripheral Vitreoretinal Adhesion</p>
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, January 2020
DOI 10.2147/opth.s235670
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masanori Fukumoto, Takaki Sato, Shou Oosuka, Teruyo Kida, Hidehiro Oku, Tsunehiko Ikeda

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 50%
Lecturer 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 83%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2020.
All research outputs
#13,866,178
of 21,371,670 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,161
of 2,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,986
of 367,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#41
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,371,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,466 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.