↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Lateral Position versus Prone Position for Cervical Laminoplasty: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
<p>Lateral Position versus Prone Position for Cervical Laminoplasty: A Retrospective Comparative Study</p>
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, February 2020
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s227799
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lin Du, Yanzheng Gao, Kun Gao, Guang Yang, Shanjun Gao

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 25%
Other 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 25%
Neuroscience 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2020.
All research outputs
#13,651,523
of 17,108,355 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#873
of 1,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,206
of 264,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,108,355 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them