↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Evaluation of Potential Pain Biomarkers in Saliva and Pain Perception After Corneal Advanced Surface Ablation Surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
<p>Evaluation of Potential Pain Biomarkers in Saliva and Pain Perception After Corneal Advanced Surface Ablation Surgery</p>
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, March 2020
DOI 10.2147/opth.s225603
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eva M Sobas, Amanda Vázquez, Sebastian Videla, Roberto Reinoso, Itziar Fernandez, Carmen Garcia-Vazquez, Miguel J Maldonado, Jose C Pastor

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Lecturer 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 36%
Sports and Recreations 1 9%
Social Sciences 1 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2020.
All research outputs
#12,377,102
of 18,829,177 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,062
of 2,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,676
of 274,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#15
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,829,177 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,260 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.