↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Intravitreal Aflibercept versus Laser Photocoagulation in Asian Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema: The VIVID-East Study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
<p>Intravitreal Aflibercept versus Laser Photocoagulation in Asian Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema: The VIVID-East Study</p>
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, March 2020
DOI 10.2147/opth.s235267
Authors

You-Xin Chen, Xiao-Xin Li, Young Hee Yoon, Xiaodong Sun, Yury Astakhov, Gezhi Xu, Hui Wang, Xiaowei Ren, Friedrich Asmus

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 21%
Student > Master 4 17%
Other 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Researcher 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Unknown 12 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2020.
All research outputs
#14,505,233
of 18,829,177 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,292
of 2,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,790
of 277,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#21
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,829,177 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,260 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.