The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Development and Evaluation of the Supportive Needs Assessment Tool for Cirrhosis (SNAC)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s236818 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patricia C Valery, Christina M Bernardes, Katherine A Stuart, Gunter F Hartel, Steven M McPhail, Richard Skoien, Tony Rahman, Paul J Clark, Leigh U Horsfall, Kelly L Hayward, Rohit Gupta, Elizabeth E Powell |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 29% |
| Psychology | 2 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2020.
All research outputs
#16,440,632
of 26,393,590 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#888
of 1,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,415
of 387,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#15
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,393,590 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.