| Title |
Epidemiology of Japanese encephalitis: past, present, and future prospects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2147/tcrm.s51168 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Huanyu Wang, Guodong Liang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 233 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 14% |
| Researcher | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 12% |
| Unknown | 78 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 38 | 16% |
| Unknown | 80 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#461
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,785
of 270,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#15
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.