↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

A Pilot Study Differentiating Recurrent Major Depression from Bipolar Disorder Cycling on the Depressive Pole [Expression of Concern]

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
<p>A Pilot Study Differentiating Recurrent Major Depression from Bipolar Disorder Cycling on the Depressive Pole [Expression of Concern]</p>
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, April 2020
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s240080
Authors

Marty Hinz, Alvin Stein, Tom Uncini

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,456,182
of 17,575,102 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#384
of 2,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,318
of 283,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,575,102 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.