The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists as treatment options for constipation in noncancer pain patients on chronic opioid therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s78042 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joseph V Pergolizzi, Robert B Raffa, Marco Pappagallo, Charles Fleischer, Joseph Pergolizzi, Gianpietro Zampogna, Elizabeth Duval, Janan Hishmeh, Jo Ann LeQuang, Robert Taylor |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 24% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 20% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 20% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,850,931
of 26,151,587 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#652
of 1,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,987
of 426,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#15
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,151,587 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.