| Title |
The Role of Hip Abductor Strength in Identifying Older Persons at Risk of Falls: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s246998 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simone Chantal Gafner, Caroline Henrice Germaine Bastiaenen, Serge Ferrari, Gabriel Gold, Andrea Trombetti, Philippe Terrier, Roger Hilfiker, Lara Allet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 16% |
| Spain | 4 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 9% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 88% |
| Scientists | 3 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 24% |
| Researcher | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 21% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,761,802
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#193
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,291
of 410,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#3
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.