↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Survey of Postoperative Pain in Photorefractive Keratectomy Using Topical versus Oral Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
<p>Survey of Postoperative Pain in Photorefractive Keratectomy Using Topical versus Oral Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs</p>
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, May 2020
DOI 10.2147/opth.s255441
Authors

Madeline Ripa, Brent Betts, Shagun Dhaliwal, Kaidi Wang, Severin Pouly, Danli Chen, Mark Mifflin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Unspecified 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 27%
Unspecified 1 9%
Environmental Science 1 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 2 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2020.
All research outputs
#12,592,334
of 21,371,670 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#876
of 2,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,617
of 305,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#11
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,371,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,466 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.