↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Retrospective chart review of a referenced EEG database in assisting medication selection for treatment of depression in patients with eating disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Retrospective chart review of a referenced EEG database in assisting medication selection for treatment of depression in patients with eating disorders
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, September 2011
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s22271
Pubmed ID
Authors

James Greenblatt, Jameson, Yuan, Iosifescu, Daniel Hoffman

Abstract

A retrospective chart review was undertaken in a private clinic to examine the clinical outcomes for patients with an eating disorder comorbid with depression or bipolar illness who underwent a referenced electroencephalographic (EEG) database analysis to help guide medication selection.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 69 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Other 9 13%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 20%
Neuroscience 5 7%
Engineering 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 15 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2012.
All research outputs
#8,661,741
of 11,266,774 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,422
of 1,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,133
of 108,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#21
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,266,774 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.