| Title |
Effect of tamsulosin versus prazosin on clinical and urodynamic parameters in women with voiding difficulty: a randomized clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of General Medicine, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijgm.s16063 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sakineh Hajebrahimi, Yadollah Ahmadi Asrbadr, Arash Azaripour, Homayoun Sadeghi-Bazargani |
| Abstract |
To compare the effects of tamsulosin and prazosin on clinical and urodynamic parameters in women with voiding dysfunction. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 25% |
| Other | 5 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 18% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 32% |
| Psychology | 6 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2011.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#1,091
of 1,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,825
of 190,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#12
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.