↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

“What we want”: chronically ill adolescents’ preferences and priorities for improving health care

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
“What we want”: chronically ill adolescents’ preferences and priorities for improving health care
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, June 2011
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s17184
Pubmed ID
Authors

AnneLoes van Staa, Jedeloo, van der Stege

Abstract

As important users of health care, adolescents with chronic conditions deserve to be consulted about their experiences and expectations. This study aimed to explore chronically ill adolescents' preferences regarding providers' qualities, and outpatient and inpatient care. Furthermore, suggestions for improvement of service delivery were collected.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 101 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Other 26 25%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 20%
Social Sciences 16 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 12 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2011.
All research outputs
#6,921,143
of 21,334,388 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#506
of 1,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,826
of 143,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#12
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,334,388 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.