↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Diagnostic indicators for peptic ulcer perforation at a tertiary care hospital in Thailand

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Diagnostic indicators for peptic ulcer perforation at a tertiary care hospital in Thailand
Published in
Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology, December 2011
DOI 10.2147/ceg.s25501
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chutikarn Suriya, Nongyao Kasatpibal, Wipada Kunaviktikul, Toranee Kayee

Abstract

Limited data currently exists regarding the diagnostic indicators of peptic ulcer perforation for early detection among patients in Thailand. Delayed diagnosis and treatment for an ulcer can be life-threatening, resulting in shock or death.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 26%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Mathematics 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 9 47%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2014.
All research outputs
#6,330,612
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
#89
of 306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,556
of 240,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them