↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Effect of physical training on urinary incontinence: a randomized parallel group trial in nursing homes.

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
Effect of physical training on urinary incontinence: a randomized parallel group trial in nursing homes.
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, February 2012
DOI 10.2147/cia.s25326
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Guttormsen Vinsnes, Helbostad, Nyrønning, Harkless, Granbo, Seim

Abstract

Residents in nursing homes (NHs) are often frail older persons who have impaired physical activity. Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common complaint for residents in NHs. Reduced functional ability and residence in NHs are documented to be risk factors for UI.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 142 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 18%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 10%
Other 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 31 21%
Unknown 31 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 23%
Sports and Recreations 9 6%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 39 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2012.
All research outputs
#15,870,114
of 17,960,381 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,473
of 1,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,284
of 136,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#18
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,960,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.