| Title |
Effect of physical training on urinary incontinence: a randomized parallel group trial in nursing homes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s25326 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne G Vinsnes, Jorunn L Helbostad, Signe Nyrønning, Gene E Harkless, Randi Granbo, Arnfinn Seim |
| Abstract |
Residents in nursing homes (NHs) are often frail older persons who have impaired physical activity. Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common complaint for residents in NHs. Reduced functional ability and residence in NHs are documented to be risk factors for UI. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 175 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 33 | 18% |
| Unknown | 54 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 21% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Unknown | 62 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2013.
All research outputs
#7,778,071
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#736
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,463
of 253,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.