| Title |
Estimated number of prevalent cases of metastatic bone disease in the US adult population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Epidemiology, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/clep.s28339 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shuling Li, Yi Peng, Eric D Weinhandl, Anne H Blaes, Karynsa Cetin, Victoria M Chia, Scott Stryker, Joseph J Pinzone, John F Acquavella, Thomas J Arneson |
| Abstract |
The prevalence of metastatic bone disease in the US population is not well understood. We sought to estimate the current number of US adults with metastatic bone disease using two large administrative data sets. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 183 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 11% |
| Researcher | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 44 | 24% |
| Unknown | 37 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 79 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 7% |
| Engineering | 10 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Unknown | 50 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2023.
All research outputs
#471,157
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#20
of 780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,050
of 173,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them