↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Estimated number of prevalent cases of metastatic bone disease in the US adult population

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
151 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
Estimated number of prevalent cases of metastatic bone disease in the US adult population
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, April 2012
DOI 10.2147/clep.s28339
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas J. Arneson, Shuling Li, Yi Peng, Eric D. Weinhandl, Anne Blaes, Karynsa Cetin, Victoria M. Chia, Scott Stryker, Joseph J. Pinzone, John Acquavella

Abstract

The prevalence of metastatic bone disease in the US population is not well understood. We sought to estimate the current number of US adults with metastatic bone disease using two large administrative data sets.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 150 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 10%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Other 38 25%
Unknown 22 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 6%
Engineering 8 5%
Chemistry 7 5%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 34 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,827,741
of 14,501,785 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#232
of 476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,019
of 124,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,501,785 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.